<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warner confirms VC1 for Blu-ray?</title>
	<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/08/25/warner-confirms-vc1-for-blu-ray/</link>
	<description>HDTV Home Theater and Television</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Warner confirms VC1 for Blu-ray? by: Franssu</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/08/25/warner-confirms-vc1-for-blu-ray/#comment-15072</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/08/25/warner-confirms-vc1-for-blu-ray/#comment-15072</guid>
					<description>Methinks they're going to look just the same. Why the hell would they use two different encodings ? If we're comparing single-layer Blu-Ray to dual-layer HD-DVD, the difference in size doesn't call for different encodings.

And even with dual-layer BR discs, the video could be the same, the extra space being used by that hungry uncompressed multichannel PCM soundtrack. And some extras. If they still do extras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Methinks they&#8217;re going to look just the same. Why the hell would they use two different encodings ? If we&#8217;re comparing single-layer Blu-Ray to dual-layer HD-DVD, the difference in size doesn&#8217;t call for different encodings.</p>
	<p>And even with dual-layer BR discs, the video could be the same, the extra space being used by that hungry uncompressed multichannel PCM soundtrack. And some extras. If they still do extras.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
