<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung BD-P1000 Blu-ray Player</title>
	<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/</link>
	<description>HDTV Home Theater and Television</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Samsung BD-P1000 Blu-ray Player by: Richard Truman</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-10291</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-10291</guid>
					<description>i don't know much about this kind of player, i just use some media players!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i don&#8217;t know much about this kind of player, i just use some media players!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Samsung BD-P1000 Blu-ray Player by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-9852</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-9852</guid>
					<description>Maybe--but you can't argue that the current crop of BD discs is at a major disadvantage.  They're using an inferior compression algorithm and they've got 5GB less space to work with.  It's a bad situation.  Although current HD-DVD players are significantly cheaper at the moment, they only output 1080i--even if the media is recorded at 1080p.  Then, if you decide to go with BD, you're buying discs that will likely be released again later once they get the dual-layer problem solved--and now it sounds like there's a problem w/ the Samsung Blu-Ray player over HDMI!

No matter which way you decide to go, it sounds as though you're going to run into some problems--and either standard may eventually fail.  I think it's too early to go one way or the other.  I wish someone would just release a combo player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe&#8211;but you can&#8217;t argue that the current crop of BD discs is at a major disadvantage.  They&#8217;re using an inferior compression algorithm and they&#8217;ve got 5GB less space to work with.  It&#8217;s a bad situation.  Although current HD-DVD players are significantly cheaper at the moment, they only output 1080i&#8211;even if the media is recorded at 1080p.  Then, if you decide to go with BD, you&#8217;re buying discs that will likely be released again later once they get the dual-layer problem solved&#8211;and now it sounds like there&#8217;s a problem w/ the Samsung Blu-Ray player over HDMI!</p>
	<p>No matter which way you decide to go, it sounds as though you&#8217;re going to run into some problems&#8211;and either standard may eventually fail.  I think it&#8217;s too early to go one way or the other.  I wish someone would just release a combo player.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Samsung BD-P1000 Blu-ray Player by: David Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-9846</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-9846</guid>
					<description>if you look at the digitalbits.com you'll see the problem is not the blu ray discs or video but the samsung player. it has problems over hdmi. 

they checked the blu ray discs using 1080i component connections and the video looked fantastic. they also checked the discs in a pioneer player and again they looked great. you may want to add an update to the above story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>if you look at the digitalbits.com you&#8217;ll see the problem is not the blu ray discs or video but the samsung player. it has problems over hdmi. </p>
	<p>they checked the blu ray discs using 1080i component connections and the video looked fantastic. they also checked the discs in a pioneer player and again they looked great. you may want to add an update to the above story
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Samsung BD-P1000 Blu-ray Player by: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-9821</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-9821</guid>
					<description>Yes that's true. Dual layer BD movies are expected by late summer. Sony should have (a) used VC1 or MPEG4 or (b) sped up development of dual-layer discs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes that&#8217;s true. Dual layer BD movies are expected by late summer. Sony should have (a) used VC1 or MPEG4 or (b) sped up development of dual-layer discs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Samsung BD-P1000 Blu-ray Player by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-9820</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2006/06/26/samsung-bd-p1000-blu-ray-player/#comment-9820</guid>
					<description>My understanding was that the current titles are all single-layer.  Is this true?  If so, it would certainly explain why the movies don't look so good.  They're using a less effective compression technology at a 5GB storage capacity deficit when compared to HD-DVD (25GB vs 30GB).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My understanding was that the current titles are all single-layer.  Is this true?  If so, it would certainly explain why the movies don&#8217;t look so good.  They&#8217;re using a less effective compression technology at a 5GB storage capacity deficit when compared to HD-DVD (25GB vs 30GB).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
