<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UDI proposed to rival HDMI &#038; DVI</title>
	<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/</link>
	<description>HDTV Home Theater and Television</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on UDI proposed to rival HDMI &#038; DVI by: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/#comment-2232</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/#comment-2232</guid>
					<description>One of our commenters also noted DVI has a very short maximum length which probably plays into the new spec as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One of our commenters also noted DVI has a very short maximum length which probably plays into the new spec as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on UDI proposed to rival HDMI &#038; DVI by: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/#comment-2051</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/#comment-2051</guid>
					<description>A clearer picture is beginning to form...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A clearer picture is beginning to form&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on UDI proposed to rival HDMI &#038; DVI by: J</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/#comment-2050</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/#comment-2050</guid>
					<description>HDMI has a 5Gbps bandwidth limit while UDI has a 16Gbps limit at this point.  The higher limit of UDI will allow for the transmission of higher resolution video and/or higher refresh rates.  
Like Kurt said, TVs aren't going past 1080p any time soon but computers are already (such as Apple's 30 inch 2560x1600 resolution display).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>HDMI has a 5Gbps bandwidth limit while UDI has a 16Gbps limit at this point.  The higher limit of UDI will allow for the transmission of higher resolution video and/or higher refresh rates.<br />
Like Kurt said, TVs aren&#8217;t going past 1080p any time soon but computers are already (such as Apple&#8217;s 30 inch 2560&#215;1600 resolution display).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on UDI proposed to rival HDMI &#038; DVI by: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/#comment-2049</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/12/21/udi-proposed-to-rival-hdmi-dvi/#comment-2049</guid>
					<description>HDMI was designed for TV, not computer displays. High end computer displays already push alot more pixels than tv's do and they will only get larger/more pixels (as I don't think tv's will be pushing past 1080p for quite some time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>HDMI was designed for TV, not computer displays. High end computer displays already push alot more pixels than tv&#8217;s do and they will only get larger/more pixels (as I don&#8217;t think tv&#8217;s will be pushing past 1080p for quite some time).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
