<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Shot with HD Camcorder</title>
	<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/07/28/movie-shot-with-hd-camcorder/</link>
	<description>HDTV Home Theater and Television</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Movie Shot with HD Camcorder by: Mike Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/07/28/movie-shot-with-hd-camcorder/#comment-147</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/07/28/movie-shot-with-hd-camcorder/#comment-147</guid>
					<description>Yeah, that would have been a perfectly fair assumption - my understanding was that HDNet only ran HD stuff, and at one point I heard they only took 1080 res stuff (no Varicam) - clearly they've backed down on their standards.

-mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, that would have been a perfectly fair assumption - my understanding was that HDNet only ran HD stuff, and at one point I heard they only took 1080 res stuff (no Varicam) - clearly they&#8217;ve backed down on their standards.</p>
	<p>-mike
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Movie Shot with HD Camcorder by: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/07/28/movie-shot-with-hd-camcorder/#comment-146</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/07/28/movie-shot-with-hd-camcorder/#comment-146</guid>
					<description>Ooops, I guess I thought it was HD because it was going to premiere on HD Net. How odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ooops, I guess I thought it was HD because it was going to premiere on HD Net. How odd.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Movie Shot with HD Camcorder by: Mike Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/07/28/movie-shot-with-hd-camcorder/#comment-145</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hdblog.net/2005/07/28/movie-shot-with-hd-camcorder/#comment-145</guid>
					<description>the SDX900 is NOT an HD camera - it's DVCPRO50, which as a format is like DV on steroids. It does shoot 16:9, it does shoot 24p, but it's only 720x480 resolution.

The SDX900 costs nearly $30K because it has nice glass, a serious sensor, and professional controls.

-mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>the SDX900 is NOT an HD camera - it&#8217;s DVCPRO50, which as a format is like DV on steroids. It does shoot 16:9, it does shoot 24p, but it&#8217;s only 720&#215;480 resolution.</p>
	<p>The SDX900 costs nearly $30K because it has nice glass, a serious sensor, and professional controls.</p>
	<p>-mike
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
