Comments on: Blu-ray / HD-DVD Compromise? http://www.hdblog.net/2005/03/25/bd-hddvd-compromise/ HDTV Home Theater and Television Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:55:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2 Comment on Blu-ray / HD-DVD Compromise? by: Administrator http://www.hdblog.net/2005/03/25/bd-hddvd-compromise/#comment-6 Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:23:45 +0000 http://www.hdblog.net/2005/03/25/bd-hddvd-compromise/#comment-6 Good point. Though I don't know what kind of benefit this would be to the HD-DVD group, considering the fact that the Blu-Ray side of the disc would be able to hold more and would therefore have more content. Alternatively, HD-DVD could be the format for movies with little extras, and Blu-Ray be the format for movies with lots of extras. Even then, how would you market this? Good point. Though I don’t know what kind of benefit this would be to the HD-DVD group, considering the fact that the Blu-Ray side of the disc would be able to hold more and would therefore have more content.

Alternatively, HD-DVD could be the format for movies with little extras, and Blu-Ray be the format for movies with lots of extras. Even then, how would you market this?

]]> Comment on Blu-ray / HD-DVD Compromise? by: GaijinBiker http://www.hdblog.net/2005/03/25/bd-hddvd-compromise/#comment-5 Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:49:58 +0000 http://www.hdblog.net/2005/03/25/bd-hddvd-compromise/#comment-5 I think by a compromise they mean something like issuing all discs with HD-DVD on one side and Blu-ray on the other... not actually creating a new standard. It would be too time-consuming and expensive to abandon all their investment and development to date. I think by a compromise they mean something like issuing all discs with HD-DVD on one side and Blu-ray on the other… not actually creating a new standard. It would be too time-consuming and expensive to abandon all their investment and development to date.

]]>